|

Ways to wage peace in 2006
Jonathan Power International Herald Tribune
THURSDAY, DECEMBER 29, 2005
STOCKHOLM War doesn't work
Critics may like to make out that America is a warrior nation with an urge
to dominate the world. But although from time to time martial figures do
push themselves through to the seats of power, they seem unable to carry the
American public with them for long.
It took the best part of a decade for public opinion to swing firmly against
the Vietnam War. This time, with tthe war in Iraq, it has taken barely three
years.
It seems likely that in the next general election Americans will vote for a
candidate who stands against overseas adventurism. Those who are trying to
erect a case for defanging a putative nuclear Iran by force will not
succeed. Nor will those who want to up the ante with China.
Nothing is simple, of course, when it comes to matters of war and peace. The
historian Edward Luttwak argued in Foreign Affairs a few years ago that, "An
unpleasant truth often overlooked is that although war is a great evil, it
does have the great virtue that it can resolve political conflicts and lead
to peace."
World War II is Everyman's exemplar of this. But World War I, the more
important geopolitically of the two great wars, was the reverse. Without the
tragic mistakes of statecraft that preceded it, allowing Europe to drift
into massive carnage, there would have been no great depression, no rise of
Hitler, no consolidation of the autocracy of Stalin, no World War II, no
unilateral development of the nuclear bomb and its use on Japan, and no Cold
War.
The tragedy of war or violence is not that sometimes it does not have
positive outcomes. It is that the same goals could have been met without war
if the protagonists had been more farsighted and more prepared to be patient
and creative in their diplomacy.
The war in Iraq has become a living example of how not to use the blunt
instrument of armed might. At the same time, its fire and smoke is obscuring
many positive trends all over the world. For the 10th successive year, the
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute has reported that the
number of wars has fallen over the last 12 months. The New York-based group
Freedom House reported this month that the spread of democracy and the
respect for human rights continues on its upward trajectory. This year was
the most successful year for freedom since 1972.
A portion of the political class too often tries to pull the wool over our
eyes by constantly impressing upon us the need for combat if our precious
freedoms are not to be undermined. Islamic terrorism is the present case in
point.
When the leaders of Egypt's Gamaa, one of the parent groups of Al Qaeda,
renounced violence three years ago from their jail cells, their declaration
was only barely reported and commented on. But it demonstrated how terrorism
can be defeated by solid police work.
And every time there is a bombing or racial disturbance in Europe, we are
fired up against the danger of militant Islam within. After the Madrid
bombing, however, senior European counterterrorism officials were reported
in this newspaper as saying that "the movement of young men from Europe to
Iraq has not come close to the levels seen in the 1980s, when at least
10,000 men travelled to Afghanistan to fight against the Soviet occupation."
Pull the wool aside and what can we see? In the journal of London's
International Institute for Strategic Studies, the analyst Michael
Mandelbaum notes, "the practice of war, once the prerogative of the strong,
instead is increasingly the tactic of the weak." Most wars these days are
conducted by and within the poorest of the world's nations.
If only we could recognize this, we could start to become more creative in
our tactics. The Financial Times reported this year that exiled Iranian
activists are studying the techniques of nonviolent conflict. They are
learning from the same group that contributed to the success of movements
for change in Serbia, Georgia and Ukraine. This is how the work of building
a more peaceful world should continue.
(Jonathan Power is a freelance writer on foreign affairs.)
|